Re: Larkins website sucks[was Re: Bill Sux]

Joerg wrote:
>
> Hello Michael,
>
> > Over five minutes a page the last time I used it, and I have 5 MB per
> > second broadband.
>
> Hasn't been that long over here but the Philips page loading is indeed
> quite anemic. They probably never tried it from overseas.
>
> It is just so weird when the top brass complains to the next managerial
> levels about not hitting their numbers while the marketing folks appear
> to be asleep at the wheel.
>
> Regards, Joerg
>
> http://www.analogconsultants.com


They should try accessing it from a third world country with a 14.4
modem and frequent disconnects. They should also base the pay the site
designers on a formula based on hits that generate sales, over bandwidth
costs. The faster a page loads, and the less they pay for bandwidth
should be rewarded.

Some of their pages were over 300 KB just to get a link to save a PDF
data***. Why can't they have a single page, or a small series of
pages with all part numbers listed along with the data *** and all
relevant application notes and spice models? No damn mouseover BS, kill
all the lousy graphics and keep the code as tight as possible.

--
Link to my "Computers for disabled Veterans" project website deleted
after threats were telephoned to my church.

Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida
.

Loading