Re: OT: followup on New Orleans - disgraceful

jmeyer@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote...
>
> All persons moving back into the affected area should be required to sign
> a release form stating that they know the area is potentially dangerous and
> relinquishing any and all rights to request Federal assistance in any form.

You're proposing to extend that hard-line position to the entire
coastline from say North Carolina to the Mexican border, I assume?


--
Thanks,
- Win
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: OT: followup on New Orleans - disgraceful
    ... >> All persons moving back into the affected area should be required to sign ... >> a release form stating that they know the area is potentially dangerous and ... > coastline from say North Carolina to the Mexican border, ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
  • Re: OT: followup on New Orleans - disgraceful
    ... >>>All persons moving back into the affected area should be required to ... >>>a release form stating that they know the area is potentially dangerous ... > houses too close to the water flooded down the American river out here I ... drainage channel ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
  • Re: OT: followup on New Orleans - disgraceful
    ... >> All persons moving back into the affected area should be required to sign ... >> a release form stating that they know the area is potentially dangerous and ... > You're proposing to extend that hard-line position to the entire ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
  • Re: OT: followup on New Orleans - disgraceful
    ... >A poster to the previous thread I started posted the following link. ... >" A year ago the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers proposed to study how New ... All persons moving back into the affected area should be required to sign a ... release form stating that they know the area is potentially dangerous and ...
    (sci.electronics.design)