Re: OT: followup on New Orleans - disgraceful
- From: John Woodgate <jmw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2005 14:54:06 +0100
I read in sci.electronics.design that Winfield Hill <Winfield_member@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote (in <df6s3u01btu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>) about 'OT: followup on New Orleans - disgraceful', on Thu, 1 Sep 2005:
jmeyer@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote...
All persons moving back into the affected area should be required to sign a release form stating that they know the area is potentially dangerous and relinquishing any and all rights to request Federal assistance in any form.
You're proposing to extend that hard-line position to the entire coastline from say North Carolina to the Mexican border, I assume?
Why not from New Mexico to the Canadian border? Save a lot of tax money! -- Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. If everything has been designed, a god designed evolution by natural selection. http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk .
- References:
- OT: followup on New Orleans - disgraceful
- From: Pooh Bear
- Re: OT: followup on New Orleans - disgraceful
- From: jmeyer
- Re: OT: followup on New Orleans - disgraceful
- From: Winfield Hill
- OT: followup on New Orleans - disgraceful
- Prev by Date: Re: Capacitor-feedback for low noise
- Next by Date: Re: Capacitor-feedback for low noise
- Previous by thread: Re: OT: followup on New Orleans - disgraceful
- Next by thread: Re: OT: followup on New Orleans - disgraceful
- Index(es):
Loading