Re: Softcore in programmable logic?!
- From: Keith Williams <krw@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2005 14:44:16 -0400
In article <1125596102.012601.32090@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
snuffie_456@xxxxxxxxx says...
> Hi,
>
> I have question about softcores in programmable logic. I hope someone
> can help me with it...
> I read that it is possible to create a microprocessor by using a
> softcore (eg. NIOS or Microblaze) and doing some programming on an FPGA
> or CPLD. But can someone tell me why you should do something like that?
Because you need a processor that doesn't exist on the FPGA?
> What are the advantages (or disadvantages) between a classical
> microprocessor and such a softcore in programmable logic?
It can be done in the FPGA fabric itself. Recently Altera and Xilinx
have been adding hard-core processors ;-) to their bigger FPGAs. Soft
cores allow the user to customize the function needed and place it
where it's needed (add multiple...). A microprocessor external to the
FPGA uses valuable I/O pins, has performance implications, may add
cost, etc.
> I have searched several times on the internet and different newsgroups.
> However, I am not able to find any relevant information.
--
Keith
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Softcore in programmable logic?!
- From: PeteS
- Re: Softcore in programmable logic?!
- References:
- Softcore in programmable logic?!
- From: Tari
- Softcore in programmable logic?!
- Prev by Date: Re: OT: followup on New Orleans - disgraceful
- Next by Date: Re: OT: Is New Orleans finished ?
- Previous by thread: Re: Softcore in programmable logic?!
- Next by thread: Re: Softcore in programmable logic?!
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|