Re: OT: followup on New Orleans - disgraceful

On 1 Sep 2005 05:27:42 -0700, Winfield Hill <Winfield_member@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wroth:

>jmeyer@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote...
>>
>> All persons moving back into the affected area should be required to sign
>> a release form stating that they know the area is potentially dangerous and
>> relinquishing any and all rights to request Federal assistance in any form.
>
> You're proposing to extend that hard-line position to the entire
> coastline from say North Carolina to the Mexican border, I assume?

There's no doubt. I've owned property on a barrier island and I can see
nothing wrong with my proposition.

Jim


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: OT: followup on New Orleans - disgraceful
    ... >> All persons moving back into the affected area should be required to sign ... >> a release form stating that they know the area is potentially dangerous and ... > coastline from say North Carolina to the Mexican border, ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
  • Re: OT: followup on New Orleans - disgraceful
    ... > All persons moving back into the affected area should be required to sign ... > a release form stating that they know the area is potentially dangerous and ... coastline from say North Carolina to the Mexican border, ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
  • Re: OT: followup on New Orleans - disgraceful
    ... >>>All persons moving back into the affected area should be required to ... >>>a release form stating that they know the area is potentially dangerous ... > houses too close to the water flooded down the American river out here I ... drainage channel ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
  • Re: OT: followup on New Orleans - disgraceful
    ... >A poster to the previous thread I started posted the following link. ... >" A year ago the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers proposed to study how New ... All persons moving back into the affected area should be required to sign a ... release form stating that they know the area is potentially dangerous and ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
Loading