Re: OT: followup on New Orleans - disgraceful
- From: keith <krw@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 03 Sep 2005 10:04:40 -0400
On Sat, 03 Sep 2005 11:07:47 +0100, John Woodgate wrote:
> I read in sci.electronics.design that Charlie Edmondson
> <edmondson@xxxxxxxx> wrote (in <4318d9b7$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>) about 'OT:
> followup on New Orleans - disgraceful', on Fri, 2 Sep 2005:
>
>>like hydrogen is non-polluting, etc.
>
> Yes, all that oxygen dihydride getting into the air. We are all doomed.
I like "Hydrogen hydroxide" better. It sounds far more ominous.
--
Keith
.
- References:
- OT: followup on New Orleans - disgraceful
- From: Pooh Bear
- Re: OT: followup on New Orleans - disgraceful
- From: bill . sloman
- Re: OT: followup on New Orleans - disgraceful
- From: richard mullens
- Re: OT: followup on New Orleans - disgraceful
- From: bill . sloman
- Re: OT: followup on New Orleans - disgraceful
- From: richard mullens
- Re: OT: followup on New Orleans - disgraceful
- From: Charlie Edmondson
- Re: OT: followup on New Orleans - disgraceful
- From: Richard Crowley
- Re: OT: followup on New Orleans - disgraceful
- From: Charlie Edmondson
- Re: OT: followup on New Orleans - disgraceful
- From: John Woodgate
- OT: followup on New Orleans - disgraceful
- Prev by Date: Re: OT: followup on New Orleans - disgraceful
- Next by Date: Re: followup on New Orleans - disgraceful
- Previous by thread: Re: OT: followup on New Orleans - disgraceful
- Next by thread: Re: OT: followup on New Orleans - disgraceful
- Index(es):