Re: OT: followup on New Orleans - disgraceful
- From: John Woodgate <jmw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2005 20:10:22 +0100
I read in sci.electronics.design that Anthony Fremont <spam@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote (in <9RkUe.53210$Nx.12659@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>) about 'OT: followup on New Orleans - disgraceful', on Fri, 9 Sep 2005:
Could have, but THAT would have been the sort of major political goof that could get GWB impeached. 'Re-starting the Civil War' is very probably a 'high crime and misdemeanour'. (;-)
"Jim Thompson" <thegreatone@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
"seizing control (of the hurricane relief mission) from the governor" is a basically a Constitutional no-no...
They could have used the Insurrection Act to do it.
--
Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only.
If everything has been designed, a god designed evolution by natural selection.
http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OT: followup on New Orleans - disgraceful
- From: Jim Thompson
- Re: OT: followup on New Orleans - disgraceful
- References:
- OT: followup on New Orleans - disgraceful
- From: Pooh Bear
- Re: OT: followup on New Orleans - disgraceful
- From: John Larkin
- Re: OT: followup on New Orleans - disgraceful
- From: Jim Thompson
- Re: OT: followup on New Orleans - disgraceful
- From: John Larkin
- Re: OT: followup on New Orleans - disgraceful
- From: Anthony Fremont
- Re: OT: followup on New Orleans - disgraceful
- From: Jim Thompson
- Re: OT: followup on New Orleans - disgraceful
- From: Anthony Fremont
- OT: followup on New Orleans - disgraceful
- Prev by Date: OT: Print over multiple pages in Acrobat Reader?
- Next by Date: Re: OT: followup on New Orleans - disgraceful
- Previous by thread: Re: OT: followup on New Orleans - disgraceful
- Next by thread: Re: OT: followup on New Orleans - disgraceful
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|