Inverse D squared v/s Inverse D sixth power ?
- From: "Graeme Zimmer" <gzimmer_NOSPAM_@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 13:59:24 -0700
Hi, (I posted this in sci.physics.electromag but didn't get a sqeak).
For Electromagnetic Radiation, most text books show the power density
(in watts per square meter) of a wavefront is inversely proportional to the
square of the distance from the source.
e.g. 1/r2
However recent discussions of Near Field Communications (NFC) indicate a
1/r6 relationship (inverse Sixth power).
see http://www.radio-electronics.com/info/wireless/nfc/nfc_overview.php
and http://www.auracomm.com/site/content/roll_off.asp
Now I understand that this is in the special case where only a magnetic
field is present (the electric field having been suppressed with shielded
antenna) (or vice versa).
The title suggests that this 1/r6 relationship only occurs in the Near
Field, but I also understand that if you have just an alternating magnetic
field, then the electric field is promptly re-created (and vice versa) (in
the Far Field ?).
So can anyone elaborate on just where and when this Inverse Sixth Power
relationship applies please?
Thanks ........... Graeme Zimmer
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Inverse D squared v/s Inverse D sixth power ?
- From: john coates
- Re: Inverse D squared v/s Inverse D sixth power ?
- From: Michael Gray
- Re: Inverse D squared v/s Inverse D sixth power ?
- From: Robert Baer
- Re: Inverse D squared v/s Inverse D sixth power ?
- Prev by Date: Re: How to detect power cutout for PC?
- Next by Date: Re: How to detect power cutout for PC?
- Previous by thread: Protel DXP PCB drag selection Question
- Next by thread: Re: Inverse D squared v/s Inverse D sixth power ?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|