Re: Inverse D squared v/s Inverse D sixth power ?
- From: Robert Baer <robertbaer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 05:15:09 GMT
Graeme Zimmer wrote:
If one creates an alternating magnetic field, it is impossible to "shield" the electric field; it will automatically be created (even in near-field).Hi, (I posted this in sci.physics.electromag but didn't get a sqeak).
For Electromagnetic Radiation, most text books show the power density (in watts per square meter) of a wavefront is inversely proportional to the square of the distance from the source.
e.g. 1/r2
However recent discussions of Near Field Communications (NFC) indicate a 1/r6 relationship (inverse Sixth power).
see http://www.radio-electronics.com/info/wireless/nfc/nfc_overview.php and http://www.auracomm.com/site/content/roll_off.asp
Now I understand that this is in the special case where only a magnetic field is present (the electric field having been suppressed with shielded antenna) (or vice versa).
The title suggests that this 1/r6 relationship only occurs in the Near
Field, but I also understand that if you have just an alternating magnetic
field, then the electric field is promptly re-created (and vice versa) (in the Far Field ?).
So can anyone elaborate on just where and when this Inverse Sixth Power relationship applies please?
Thanks ........... Graeme Zimmer
Vice-versa also.
Just look at the E-M equations...
.
- References:
- Inverse D squared v/s Inverse D sixth power ?
- From: Graeme Zimmer
- Inverse D squared v/s Inverse D sixth power ?
- Prev by Date: Re: Winding a mobius coil?
- Next by Date: Re: OT: Lyndon B. Bush - A Miserable Failure
- Previous by thread: Inverse D squared v/s Inverse D sixth power ?
- Next by thread: Re: Inverse D squared v/s Inverse D sixth power ?
- Index(es):
Loading