Re: Inverse D squared v/s Inverse D sixth power ?
- From: "Phil Allison" <philallison@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 17:04:35 +1000
"Michael Gray"
>
> Auracomm's technical claims seem a trifle suspect to me.
> Have you tried actually asking them directly?
** Read their wording carefully.
The magnetic field said to be " quasi static " ??
Is that a bar magnet dangling on a string ??
............ Phil
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Inverse D squared v/s Inverse D sixth power ?
- From: Michael Gray
- Re: Inverse D squared v/s Inverse D sixth power ?
- References:
- Inverse D squared v/s Inverse D sixth power ?
- From: Graeme Zimmer
- Re: Inverse D squared v/s Inverse D sixth power ?
- From: Michael Gray
- Inverse D squared v/s Inverse D sixth power ?
- Prev by Date: Re: A Bridge Replacement A Good Idea?
- Next by Date: Re: A Bridge Replacement A Good Idea?
- Previous by thread: Re: Inverse D squared v/s Inverse D sixth power ?
- Next by thread: Re: Inverse D squared v/s Inverse D sixth power ?
- Index(es):
