Re: SMPS question
- From: Robert Latest <boblatest@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 22 Sep 2005 09:04:16 GMT
On Wed, 21 Sep 2005 08:56:58 +1200,
Terry Given <my_name@xxxxxxxx> wrote
in Msg. <wI_Xe.13255$iM2.1117632@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> at such low voltages I would use a diagonal half-bridge primary - a
> switch at either end of the winding, one to +30V, one to 0V. And a pair
> of (schottky) diodes, one to 0V (at the +30V end), the other to +30V.
>
> drive both switches simultaneously. Both on = energy storage. both off =
> energy transfer. the primary winding voltage is now clamped to the +30V
> bus, by the two diodes. Voila, no spike and almost no losses.
Sounds good; I'll consider it.
> sandwich the smallest winding (fewest turns) between the two halves of
> the largest winding (most turns). This'll give you a significant
> reduction in leakage inductance, and allow you to use thicker copper
> (the number of effective layers halves)
I must confess that this doesn't make sense to me. The way I understand
it is: Leakage inductance is created by flux that goes through one
winding but not fully through the other (which makes it synonymous with
poosr magnetic coupling). In other words, the portion of flux that the
primary created but that doesn't go through the secondary will obviously
not be reset by the secondary (and be put to good use on the load side)
but will cause voltage spikes on the primary side that need to be dealt
with. In the "diagonal" setup that you described, it will be fed back
into the primary-side storage cap.
But before you go into explaining what "effective layers" means I really
should read a book.
> all first-order switchers have an L and a C. in a flyback, L=Lmag.
>
> otherwise, the primary switches see a capacitive load, with either dV/dt
> or R setting the peak current (ignoring leakage....)
Ooops .. I should have thought of that myself.
> Keith Billings Switch Mode Power Supply Handbook, followed by Abraham
> Pressmans Switching Power Supply Design. both McGraw-Hill
A lot of money for a lot of knowledge.
Thanks,
robert
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: SMPS question
- From: Terry Given
- Re: SMPS question
- References:
- Re: SMPS question
- From: cbarn24050
- Re: SMPS question
- From: Robert Latest
- Re: SMPS question
- Prev by Date: Re: Looking for fast counter/divider
- Next by Date: OT: Using the 'FILE' protocol?
- Previous by thread: Re: SMPS question
- Next by thread: Re: SMPS question
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|