Re: Brilliant idea needed!!!
- From: anno4000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Anno Siegel)
- Date: 22 Sep 2005 12:44:17 GMT
Geocacher <gps@xxxxxxxx> wrote in sci.electronics.design:
> I work in the trailer manufacturing business.
> We use LED tail-light clusters.
> The modern truck/tractors utilise a computer system to perform diagnostics
> on various systems within the rig. One of these is the lighting system.
> A pulse is sent to each tail light, the system monitoring the current. If
> there is current flow, it is assumed the incandescent globes are OK.
>
> Unfortunately, the LED lamps draw such a small amount of current that the
> computer does not see a "filament" and flags a major fault on the truck
> dashboard. In addition to the error message, the system continues to send
> curent pulss in the forlorn hope that things at the rear of the rig have
> improved. This causes the entire suite of LED lamps to flash like a
> low-class disco!
>
> There are ways around it. Some manufacturers have placed incandescent globes
> in parallel with the LED lamps, others have used high wattage resistors.
> Neither is acceptable for obvious reasons.
>
> There must be a way to "tell" the computer that the LED lamps are fine by
> emulating the current drawn by an incandescent globe, without using the
> solutions noted above.
The test you describe is applicable while the tail-lights are off. Does
the diagnostic system permanently monitor the current when they are
switched on? If so, I don't see a simple solution except re-calibrating
the current the diagnostic system expects.
For the test you describe you could use the parallel resistor, but switch
it off after a second or so of power. The duration must be long enough
to cover the test pulse and short enough not to cause excess power
consumption in the long run. A more sophisticated solution would check
if the LED array draws the expected current and only add the parallel
resistor if it does.
Anno
--
If you want to post a followup via groups.google.com, don't use
the broken "Reply" link at the bottom of the article. Click on
"show options" at the top of the article, then click on the
"Reply" at the bottom of the article headers.
.
- Prev by Date: Re: OT: Using the 'FILE' protocol?
- Next by Date: Re: use HSPICE to simulate circuits if being a hardware engineer?.....
- Previous by thread: operational amplifier
- Next by thread: Re: Brilliant idea needed!!!
- Index(es):