Re: PIC16F74 Checksum(s)
- From: Spehro Pefhany <speffSNIP@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2005 11:59:59 -0400
On 5 Oct 2005 08:17:08 -0700, the renowned stlham59@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>The checksum of the PIC code reads differently on different device
>programmers.
>
>Is this expected with this device?
>
>Is there some way to predict what it should be?
>
>Any information or links on this subject would be appreciated.
>
>Thanks,
>Dave
Probably they just use different methods to calculate the checksum.
IIRC, that part lacks the capability of reading its own program memory
directly, so its rather a moot point.
Best regards,
Spehro Pefhany
--
"it's the network..." "The Journey is the reward"
speff@xxxxxxxxxxxx Info for manufacturers: http://www.trexon.com
Embedded software/hardware/analog Info for designers: http://www.speff.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: PIC16F74 Checksum(s)
- From: Winfield Hill
- Re: PIC16F74 Checksum(s)
- From: Spehro Pefhany
- Re: PIC16F74 Checksum(s)
- References:
- PIC16F74 Checksum(s)
- From: stlham59
- PIC16F74 Checksum(s)
- Prev by Date: Re: Nicotine patches are a waste of money
- Next by Date: Re: Micro-VGA Adapter.
- Previous by thread: PIC16F74 Checksum(s)
- Next by thread: Re: PIC16F74 Checksum(s)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|