Re: Lunacy from Brussels
- From: Richard the Dreaded Libertarian <Say_Rich_Greiss@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 20:47:15 GMT
On Thu, 13 Oct 2005 18:45:30 +0100, John Woodgate wrote:
> I read in sci.electronics.design that bill.sloman@xxxxxxxx wrote (in
> <1129217808.758747.233850@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>) about 'Lunacy
> from Brussels', on Thu, 13 Oct 2005:
>>zwsdotcom@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>> > > anarcho-syndicalist tradition?
>>> >
>>> > Think Joe Hill.
>>>
>>> Or Monty Python. It is beyond belief to me that anyone could point to
>>> any aspect of Brussels and consider it a good example of any positive
>>> trait. It's a very long trough full of very stupid snouts.
>>
>>Bad as it is, the Republican administration in the U.S. is worse -
>>before you get too rude about Brussells, you have the review the
>>existing alternatives, which are remarkably unattractive.
>
> Brussels is a sort of 'neutral territory' for the big EU countries. The
> really small states carefully avoided hosting the white elephant.
>
> How do you feel about Canberra as the site of the World Government in
> 2075? Wellington took the hint from Vaduz and San Marino, of course.
The "World Government" should be at the bottom of the ocean, or maybe
on the Moon.
Thanks!
Rich
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Lunacy from Brussels
- From: bill . sloman
- Re: Lunacy from Brussels
- From: John Woodgate
- Re: Lunacy from Brussels
- References:
- Re: Lunacy from Brussels
- From: bill . sloman
- Re: Lunacy from Brussels
- From: John Woodgate
- Re: Lunacy from Brussels
- Prev by Date: Re: Lunacy from Brussels
- Next by Date: Re: advice on cheap pressure sensors
- Previous by thread: Re: Lunacy from Brussels
- Next by thread: Re: Lunacy from Brussels
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading