Re: PLL Lock to an Offset Frequency
- From: Jim Thompson <thegreatone@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 16:40:23 -0700
On Fri, 14 Oct 2005 16:00:06 -0700, Jim Thompson
<thegreatone@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>On Fri, 14 Oct 2005 18:39:50 -0400, Phil Hobbs
><pcdh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>[snip]
>>
>>Perhaps we were starting from different points.
>>
>>Instead of using a SSB mixer, use an offset PLL as suggested by the OP,
>>running at 1:1. This is an alternative to the 64x PLL with the 125-kHz
>>reference frequency, that avoids the phase noise penalty of frequency
>>multiplication (in this case, 20*log(64) or 36 dB). Something like this:
>>
>> USB/LSB----------------------------------------------+
>> |
>> |
>> |
>> 125 kHz ref--------------------------------+ |
>> | |
>> _ _V__ _ _V__
>>8 MHz carrier------\\---\ RC=700 ns | | | X |
>> )) >---RRRR---+--->| PFD |---| +-1|---------+
>> +-//---/ | |_____| |____| |
>> | R
>> | (xor) CCC R
>> | | +-CCC--RRR--+ R
>> | GND ___ | /| | |
>> | / \ | /-|----+---+
>> +-----------<----------| VCO |<--+---< |
>> | | \+|----+
>> \___/ \| |
>> GND
>>
>>The nice feature of a correctly-designed offset PLL, using a PFD, is
>>that you can get rid of the other sideband to any accuracy you like with
>>a lowpass filter on the loop control voltage--using all jellybean parts
>>zero inductors, and zero tweaks. You can choose USB or LSB by switching
>>the sign of the loop gain, e.g. by swapping PFD outputs, negating them
>>with an extra XOR each, or using a +-unity gain amp. It would be almost
>>as cheap to generate all three signals and switch the outputs with a mux.
>>
>>Thus instead of needing to use fancy things like SSB mixers, narrow
>>filters, or 500 MHz divide-by-Ns, or accepting the 36-dB phase noise
>>penalty of multiplication, you can do it all with a PFD, one or two op
>>amps, and a few gates, none of which will need any adjustment. This is
>>all a consequence of the nice phase properties of offset PLLs, as
>>described previously. Which works the best depends on the VCO design
>>and other constraints--e.g. an RC VCO is probably noisy enough that the
>>36-dB phase noise added to the reference signal is a drop in the bucket.
>>
>>
>>Cheers,
>>
>>Phil Hobbs
>
>OK. Now I follow you. Somehow I missed the "offset loop".
>
>I like it!
>
>I've seen similar things done using a D-Flop as a harmonic mixer.
>
> ...Jim Thompson
Phil,
The more I study your scheme the more I like it! I have a 1056MHz ±
132MHz situation that would be a perfect application of your
configuration, because it's clearly superior for high ratios of
carrier to offset.
...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona Voice:(480)460-2350 | |
| E-mail Address at Website Fax:(480)460-2142 | Brass Rat |
| http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |
I love to cook with wine. Sometimes I even put it in the food.
.
- References:
- Re: PLL Lock to an Offset Frequency
- From: Phil Hobbs
- Re: PLL Lock to an Offset Frequency
- From: Jim Thompson
- Re: PLL Lock to an Offset Frequency
- From: Phil Hobbs
- Re: PLL Lock to an Offset Frequency
- From: Jim Thompson
- Re: PLL Lock to an Offset Frequency
- From: Phil Hobbs
- Re: PLL Lock to an Offset Frequency
- From: Jim Thompson
- Re: PLL Lock to an Offset Frequency
- From: Phil Hobbs
- Re: PLL Lock to an Offset Frequency
- From: Jim Thompson
- Re: PLL Lock to an Offset Frequency
- From: Phil Hobbs
- Re: PLL Lock to an Offset Frequency
- From: Jim Thompson
- Re: PLL Lock to an Offset Frequency
- Prev by Date: Re: Snubber circuit design
- Next by Date: Re: Audio Delay Circuit
- Previous by thread: Re: PLL Lock to an Offset Frequency
- Next by thread: Re: PLL Lock to an Offset Frequency
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|