Re: High Side Pulse Transmitter
- From: John Larkin <jjlarkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 08:19:52 -0700
On 17 Oct 2005 06:09:18 -0700, Winfield Hill
<Winfield_member@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Just to show it can be done with five parts. A few more parts
>>>> could be used to improve the circuit, of course. Jeff can test
>>>> it with spice, if he has the right transistor models.
>>>
>>> Now you know that circuit is unusable- so you haven't "done"
>> anything with those five parts.
>>
>> What's unusable about it? It's simple, it satisfies all the stated
>> requirements and, more important, it should work in the application.
>
> Hi John. I surely don't know what Fred is talking about. Perhaps
> he's referring to my circuit using BJTs instead of FETs? Nah, his
> latest circuit uses BJTs. Perhaps he just prefers his solution:
>
Yup, he always does.
John
.
- References:
- Re: High Side Pulse Transmitter
- From: John Larkin
- Re: High Side Pulse Transmitter
- From: Jim Thompson
- Re: High Side Pulse Transmitter
- From: John Larkin
- Re: High Side Pulse Transmitter
- From: Winfield Hill
- Re: High Side Pulse Transmitter
- From: John Larkin
- Re: High Side Pulse Transmitter
- From: Winfield Hill
- Re: High Side Pulse Transmitter
- From: John Larkin
- Re: High Side Pulse Transmitter
- From: Fred Bloggs
- Re: High Side Pulse Transmitter
- From: Winfield Hill
- Re: High Side Pulse Transmitter
- From: Fred Bloggs
- Re: High Side Pulse Transmitter
- From: John Larkin
- Re: High Side Pulse Transmitter
- From: Winfield Hill
- Re: High Side Pulse Transmitter
- Prev by Date: Re: SDRAM stable ?
- Next by Date: Re: Watch Crystal dissipation
- Previous by thread: Re: High Side Pulse Transmitter
- Next by thread: Re: High Side Pulse Transmitter
- Index(es):