Re: political post: the USA is *not* number one!
- From: John Larkin <jjlarkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 16:58:39 -0700
On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 00:05:25 +0100, Pooh Bear
<rabbitsfriendsandrelations@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>John Larkin wrote:
>
>> On 18 Oct 2005 15:23:12 -0700, bill.sloman@xxxxxxxx wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >Europe could be doing better economically - unfortunately, the major
>> >countries introduced the euro recently, and took a vow to hold their
>> >budget deficits to 2% or less, which was most non-Kenysian of them, but
>> >bankers don't like Keynes.
>>
>> The problem with having multiple countries share a common currency is
>> that each has a local incentive to print lots of it, hence the
>> restriction.
>
>Actually they can't do that.
Isn't that exactly what I said? "hence the restriction", or something
like that, as I recall.
>
>Issued capital is controlled by the Central Bank. In fact it's probably the
>tightest monetary system ever put into practice !
Don't France and Germany want to (and in fact do?) violate the limits
on government spending?
John
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: political post: the USA is *not* number one!
- From: Pooh Bear
- Re: political post: the USA is *not* number one!
- References:
- Re: political post: the USA is *not* number one!
- From: Dirk Bruere at Neopax
- Re: political post: the USA is *not* number one!
- From: John Larkin
- Re: political post: the USA is *not* number one!
- From: bill . sloman
- Re: political post: the USA is *not* number one!
- From: John Larkin
- Re: political post: the USA is *not* number one!
- From: Pooh Bear
- Re: political post: the USA is *not* number one!
- Prev by Date: Re: political post: the USA is *not* number one!
- Next by Date: Re: political post: the USA is *not* number one!
- Previous by thread: Re: political post: the USA is *not* number one!
- Next by thread: Re: political post: the USA is *not* number one!
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|