Re: Op Amp Calculations

On Sat, 22 Oct 2005 12:37:25 -0400, keith <krw@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>On Sat, 22 Oct 2005 09:06:42 -0700, John Larkin wrote:
>
>> On 22 Oct 2005 03:20:11 -0700, Winfield Hill
>> <Winfield_member@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>>keith wrote...
>>>>
>>>> How come we get all the leftists on the right coast?
>>>> Blue-nosed red-statist leftists, at that! ;-)
>>>
>>> You think it's funny to smear other group members, but
>>> George Bush is an idiot, pure and simple, and is doing
>>> us all more damage than we should put up with. That's
>>> not the least bit funny. I can't understand how you
>>> right-wingers put up with him. When are y'all going to
>>> wake up, clear your eyes, and see him for what he is?
>>
>> Part of the reason is that a largish number of Americans actually want
>> ineffective Federal government... I sure do... so if they accept Bush
>> as inept, that's fine with them. And if they accept him as a
>> politically-skilled conservative, that's just about as good.
>
>The problem is that he ISN'T conservative. ...but far better than the
>other choices available! Voting is rarely about "for", rather than
>"against".
>
>> Liberals, meaning people who want lots of government involvement in
>> everything, assume that a successful, activist President is desirable.
>> Lots of people disagree, which is why we so often elect a President from
>> one party and a Congress from the other, or why we so seldom elect
>> Senators or VPs or policy wonks to the Presidency.
>
>Congress gets their power by bring bacon home. To do so they collaborate
>to divy up the pork. The presidency is seem as more of a manager.
>Congress critters are seen to have no management credentials. Presidents
>usually come from the ranks of govenors (similar function).
>
>> And I don't personally see what damage he's causing, especially if you
>> compare him to train-wreck administrations like Johnson, Carter, or
>> Clinton.
>
>Exactly, but I'd throw Ford into that wreck too.
>

Ford got soundly trashed for taking the swine flu thing seriously,
preparing for a pandemic that never happened. Deja vu all over again.

And SNL had a running theme of portraying him as clumsy, when he was
in fact a good athlete.

>> If you refer to whining by Europeans, that ain't damage.
>
>...or whining by leftist right-coast blue-nosed red-statists. I just love
>it when the idiot Howie Dean opens his mouth. They sure picked a leader
>there!

Their own worst enemies, they are. If they can't make coherent
progress against Bush, who certainly offers lots of material to work
with, they are in deep, dark, fundamental doo-doo.

John


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: [US Election last minute troll] Things you have to believe to be a Republican
    ... Only an idiot thinks Iraq ... All the men in the Bush family are against abortion; ... > some reason, republicans, and President Bush, did quite the opposite. ... > should abrogate their rights as parents to the school system? ...
    (sci.econ)
  • Re: OT: Bloody Yanks up to their tricks again !
    ... those who voted for this incompetent idiot. ... Where is the one that says George Bush must become president? ... predecessor Reagan seems to be able to rely on it. ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
  • Re: Civil Liberties - what *really* matters?
    ... school and interviewed for 20 mins by secret service men. ... calling President Bush an idiot on her MySpace page. ... called "So Bush is an idiot but hey what ...
    (uk.religion.pagan)
  • MSM failing to do its job.
    ... that Saddam was disarmed, ... Bush as nothing more that a dumb arse patsy for Cheney's Presidency. ... Bush is not a idiot, or an imbecile, he's potentially the most ... President the US will ever have! ...
    (alt.politics)
  • Re: Fake news (ndc)
    ... even that funny or provocative. ... Stephen Colbert was not funny at the White House Correspondents' Association ... stenographers recording what the Bush White House said. ... anyone can insult the president of the United States. ...
    (rec.music.gdead)