Re: diode curve

On Sat, 12 Nov 2005 13:21:19 -0700, Jim Thompson
<To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>On Sat, 12 Nov 2005 12:05:55 -0800, John Larkin
><jjlarkinSNIP@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 12 Nov 2005 19:58:19 GMT, "Genome" <ilike_spam@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"John Larkin" <jjlarkinSNIP@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>>news:24hcn19g5dr7mdkpo56t6441omdkgdsnt5@xxxxxxxxxx
>>>> The latest Electronic Design ("The Authority on Emerging Technologies
>>>> for Design Solutions", whatever the hell that might mean) has an
>>>> Analog Devices ad on page 34 that includes a useful silicon diode
>>>> voltage:temperature curve (mislabeled "resistance as a function of
>>>> temperature"). It shows Vf = 0.1 volts at +200 degrees C increasing to
>>>> 1.6 volts at -310 C.
>>>>
>>>> John
>>>
>>>Try.......
>>>
>>>"Leveraging the optimal solution driven enterprise initiative"
>>>
>>>*** like what comes up with that is given control of your pension minus
>>>their cut minus the cut of the *** that gave them your money in the first
>>>place.
>>>
>>>DNA
>>>
>>
>>Some guy keeps calling me offering to provide "integrated enterprise
>>solutions" but so far I can't get him to explain what his company
>>actually does. I suspect he doesn't know.
>>
>>Oh well, we're off for oyster sandwiches.
>>
>>John
>>
>
>WHAT, pray tell, is an "oyster sandwich" ?:-)
>
> ...Jim Thompson


Sorry, I can't explain it in any other way. I just is. Or, actually,
was.

John
.

Loading