Re: off tiopc
- From: Ken Moffett <KMoffett@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 13:39:25 GMT
Paul Burke <paul@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in news:3u5h2lFvhf81U1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
> Dope mcSmoke wrote:
>>
>> I've seen it in Swedish, too.. worked the same. Are japanese words put
>> together the same way (kind of phonetically) as latin lanuages do?
>
> The non- ideographic scripts are syllabaries, so the words tend to be
> shorter.
>
> The whole thing ought to be a clincher in the argument among
> educationalists between phonetic and whole- word reading.
I think this is irrelevent to "learning" readers, and only works on
"experienced" ones. Similar to mores code. I needed to hear and interpret
every dit-dah. (I can't even do thet now.) A decent ham just hears "word
patterns" in context, and would ignore minor "errors".
> Though, of
> course, I doubt if anyone has used that particular text to teach 5 year
> olds to read. We had to make do with a text that started promisingly,
> "This is ***", but went downhill from there.
>
> Paul Burke
.
- References:
- Re: off tiopc
- From: Pooh Bear
- Re: off tiopc
- From: Sjouke Burry
- Re: off tiopc
- From: Rich Grise
- Re: off tiopc
- From: Dope mcSmoke
- Re: off tiopc
- From: Paul Burke
- Re: off tiopc
- Prev by Date: Re: Excellent Landing!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"!
- Next by Date: Re: Nanotube are more efficient IR source than LEDs
- Previous by thread: Re: off tiopc
- Next by thread: Re: off tiopc
- Index(es):