Re: OT- Wankers
- From: Mac <foo@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 19:43:23 GMT
On Sat, 19 Nov 2005 18:19:41 +1300, Real_McCoy wrote:
>
> "Mac" <foo@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:pan.2005.11.19.04.49.39.20096@xxxxxxxxxx
>> On Sat, 19 Nov 2005 14:38:58 +1300, Real_McCoy wrote:
>>
>> > I was wondering if all Americanos were Wankers like George Bush or if
>> > (surely at least) professional engineers in the U.S are intelligent
> enough
>> > to see thru him.
>> >
>> > McC
>>
>> Considering how low his approval ratings are nowadays, there is no reason
>> to suppose that any profession falls entirely in the Bush camp.
>>
>> Do all professional engineers in your country (New Zealand?) misspell
>> "through" as "thru," or are some well educated and literate?
>>
>> --Mac
>>
> I spelt it thru so that Merkins would understand the spelling - like color
> or labor. I suppose if you have no argument you can always go for the
> spelling.
>
> McC
"Thru" is just as incorrect in the US as anywhere else.
There is no need for argument. You asked a question, although it obviously
contains an implicit assumption, and I guess that could be considered a
statement, but certainly not an argument.
By the way, is "spelt" a correct conjugation of the verb "to spell" or is
it only a noun?
--Mac
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OT- Wankers
- From: Real_McCoy
- Re: OT- Wankers
- References:
- OT- Wankers
- From: Real_McCoy
- Re: OT- Wankers
- From: Mac
- Re: OT- Wankers
- From: Real_McCoy
- OT- Wankers
- Prev by Date: Re: OT - 2005 Will Probably be Warmest on Record
- Next by Date: Re: OT- Wankers
- Previous by thread: Re: OT- Wankers
- Next by thread: Re: OT- Wankers
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
