Re: OT- Wankers

On Sat, 19 Nov 2005 19:09:45 +1300, Real_McCoy wrote:

>
> "John Larkin" <jjlarkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:ae7tn1lllmjo2gu3v77jb7896egjvgnk32@xxxxxxxxxx
>> On Sat, 19 Nov 2005 16:23:35 +1300, "Real_McCoy"
>> <McCoy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >"John Larkin" <jjlarkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
> message
>> >news:d93tn1hum4ahf8knkdistci8upvrb46akv@xxxxxxxxxx
>> >> On Sat, 19 Nov 2005 14:38:58 +1300, "Real_McCoy"
>> >> <McCoy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >I was wondering if all Americanos were Wankers like George Bush or if
>> >> >(surely at least) professional engineers in the U.S are intelligent
>> >enough
>> >> >to see thru him.
>> >> >
>> >> >McC
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> What do you mean by "see thru him?" W is pretty much wysiwyg to me.
>> >>
>> >> Where do you live, and are professional engineers there uniformly
>> >> wise?
>> >>
>> >> John
>> >>
>> >Yes they are pretty wise worldwide.
>> >
>> >McC
>> >
>>
>> In that case, you need not have asked the original question.
>>
>> John
>>
> Maybe, but nobody has answer it yet!
>

Several people have answered it, after a fashion, including me. Nobody
wants to give a straight "yes" or "no" answer because you have worded an
implicit assumption into the question, and people resent endorsing
implicit assumptions, even when they agree with them.

--Mac

> McC

.

Quantcast