Re: Digital TV quality
- From: "Roger Hamlett" <rogerspamignored@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2005 15:43:44 GMT
"Jim Thompson" <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
message news:p37jp1p6k1f7lg5q4mcs6pcniqevnaiipk@xxxxxxxxxx
> On Fri, 9 Dec 2005 14:03:59 -0000, "john jardine"
> <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Joerg" <notthisjoergsch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>news:pn8mf.24763$BZ5.22600@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [snip]
>>> ...the rear of the car was gravely distorted. It looked as if
>>> the data path was choking.
>>>
>>> Is this what we are going to get once the analog channels are turned
>>> off?
>>>
>>> Regards, Joerg
>>>
>>> http://www.analogconsultants.com
>>
>>Yes Indeed!.
>>In the UK we've about 4 years before the analogue transmissions are
>>switched
>>off. Part of the process involves softening us up with a small number
>>of
>>free-to-view digital channels.
>>Picture quality is noticeably inferior to that of an analogue
>>transmission
>>yet I've never seen any complaints.
>>Couldn't rent VHS videos any more, so 6 months ago had to buy a DVD
>>player.
>>Found DVD picture quality is even poorer than a VHS tape, yet the DVD
>>industry tells me their picture quality is better!.
> [snip]
>>Bollocks to 'em. I won't be going digital :-)
>>regards
>>john
>
> I'm puzzled by your DVD quality problem complaint. I get excellent
> results here.
I have to agree.
Digital quality, can be excellent. Yes, the signal will broadcast using a
normal amplifier box. However every extra 'stage', will degrade the
signal, increasing the risk of pixelation.
Seriously, my current digital signals, run 'rings' round the analog
service. You can see the nose-hairs, on the presenters faces (if this is
your 'thing!), and DVD, is superb. I'd suspect first of all that the
original poster, is using the analog out on the DVD, at UHF, rather than
RGB signalling. I'd then further suspect that the DVD's output is tuned to
a frequency that is perhaps getting interference from channel 5 (a common
effect). DVD, is normally limited by the quality of the player iself, and
the set involved. I'd perhaps suspect that this is one of the cheaper DVD
players, and combined with an analog 'aerial style' connection, is giving
the poor results seen.
I have analog, Freeview, cable, and satellite. Currently satellite has the
best quality (just), unless there is odd atmospheric conditions. Cable is
a very close second, Freeview gives more tendency to pixelation, but for
80% of the time still easily beats analog.
Best Wishes
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Digital TV quality
- From: Joerg
- Re: Digital TV quality
- References:
- Digital TV quality
- From: Joerg
- Re: Digital TV quality
- From: john jardine
- Re: Digital TV quality
- From: Jim Thompson
- Digital TV quality
- Prev by Date: Re: adding an enable to a bipolar op-amp, how???
- Next by Date: Re: 1 second UPS
- Previous by thread: Re: Digital TV quality
- Next by thread: Re: Digital TV quality
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|