Re: Something we can all agree on


"Dr. Anton T. Squeegee" <SpammersAreJerks@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:MPG.1e0deca15e682fdf989735@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> In article <MsNof.319$xF6.166@fed1read01>, rphenry@xxxxxxxx says...
>
> > I see the Senate has killed the "Patriot" Act.
>
> Not the whole act, regrettably... Just some portions of it that
> were particularly nasty.
>

It appears I was a little hasty. I see by CNN today that W has decided he
can authorize wiretaps without all that messy warrant business, that he can
keep the process a secret, and that he can complain that it "damages our
national security" to disagree with him about it.

So who needs the Patriot Act, anyway?


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Something we can all agree on
    ... >> Not the whole act, ... Just some portions of it that ... >> were particularly nasty. ... risk of being blown to bits. ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
  • Re: Something we can all agree on
    ... Richard Henry wrote: ... Just some portions of it that ... >> were particularly nasty. ... > So who needs the Patriot Act, ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
  • Re: Great SWT Program
    ... If I did go on to act as you do, ... None of the nasty things that you have said or implied about me are at ... moron you think I am or some equally nasty and irrelevant excuse for a ... That's a ludicrous excuse for an analogy. ...
    (comp.lang.java.programmer)
  • Re: OT: Wal Mart-Friends with Low Wages
    ... it just proves you know much less than you like to act like. ... Nothing nasty about what I posted. ... Where is the requirement for those folks to work ... You don't know anything about sarcasm do you. ...
    (rec.outdoors.rv-travel)
  • Re: OT: Wal Mart-Friends with Low Wages
    ... it just proves you know much less than you like to act like. ... Nothing nasty about what I posted. ... Where is the requirement for those folks to work ... You don't know anything about sarcasm do you. ...
    (rec.outdoors.rv-travel)