Re: Something we can all agree on
- From: John Larkin <jjlarkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 20:24:16 -0800
On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 18:50:40 -0800, "Richard Henry" <rphenry@xxxxxxxx>
wrote:
>
>"John Larkin" <jjlarkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>news:c7j9q153sftkt709i50pttvls7t7tcf1gn@xxxxxxxxxx
>> On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 17:49:52 -0800, "Richard Henry" <rphenry@xxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> >So now that W has admitted committing a crime, and has confirmed that he
>> >will do it again, when do the impeachment hearings start?
>>
>> Don't be silly. Members of Congress of both parties were briefed on
>> what was going on. And these same people are going to vote to impeach
>> him? And, during those hearings, reveal who leaked?
>>
>> I suspect not.
>
>So you don't deny that it's a crime?
>
Tapping international phone calls to try to keep Americans from being
killed? Do you think that's a crime?
I don't, and there's a couple thousand years of legal precedence that
says it's not.
John
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Something we can all agree on
- From: Richard Henry
- Re: Something we can all agree on
- References:
- Something we can all agree on
- From: Richard Henry
- Re: Something we can all agree on
- From: Dr . Anton T . Squeegee
- Re: Something we can all agree on
- From: Richard Henry
- Re: Something we can all agree on
- From: John Larkin
- Re: Something we can all agree on
- From: Richard Henry
- Re: Something we can all agree on
- From: John Larkin
- Re: Something we can all agree on
- From: Richard Henry
- Something we can all agree on
- Prev by Date: Re: OT: Political dead horse
- Next by Date: Re: Something we can all agree on
- Previous by thread: Re: Something we can all agree on
- Next by thread: Re: Something we can all agree on
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|