Re: Something we can all agree on

On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 22:35:59 -0800, John Larkin wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 21:46:02 -0800, "Richard Henry" <rphenry@xxxxxxxx>
>>"John Larkin" <jjlarkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>> On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 18:50:40 -0800, "Richard Henry" <rphenry@xxxxxxxx>

>>W apparently decided he doesn't need them. Or his handlers told him he
>>doesn't need them.
>>
>>> I don't, and there's a couple thousand years of legal precedence that
>>> says it's not.
>>
>>A couple thousand years of wiretapping?
>>
>>
> A couple of thousand years of recognizing that a small crime is no crime
> if it prevents a much bigger one.
>

That's an awfully slippery razor blade to find oneself sliding down.

Thanks,
Rich

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Something we can all agree on
    ... Or his handlers told him he ... >>>A couple thousand years of wiretapping? ... >> A couple of thousand years of recognizing that a small crime is no crime ... >That's an awfully slippery razor blade to find oneself sliding down. ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
  • Re: And Justice for all!
    ... This is more the 'War on celebrity' ...
    (sci.military.naval)
  • Re: Jail Statistics Re: Graham Crackers
    ... I never said rich and middle class people don't commit crime. ... And the shoplifting done by the offspring of rich ...
    (misc.rural)
  • Re: And Justice for all!
    ... young woman to jail will actually do any good? ... William Black ...
    (sci.military.naval)
  • Re: And Justice for all!
    ... young woman to jail will actually do any good? ... The two previous replies to this thread obviously prove my point. ...
    (sci.military.naval)