Re: analog multiplier help
- From: theJackal <f_a_s_t_g_s_f_r_i_d_e_r@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 22:03:45 +0100
On 19 Dec 2005 08:57:46 -0800, bill.sloman@xxxxxxxx wrote:
>
>theJackal wrote:
>> On Sun, 18 Dec 2005 11:26:16 +1100, Adam S
>> <a_seDELETEycUPPERCASEShelLl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
><snip>
>
>> With an integrated product you don't know whats in there and normally
>> that makes me feel uncomfortable.
>
>Barry Gilbert of Analog Devices has published a number of papers on
>"Gilbert cell" mixer's and multipliers.
>
>A search on "Gilbert B." + translinear on scholar.google.com picks up
>some 28 references.
>
>You should be able to get pretty fair idea of what goes into the Analog
>Devices mulitpliers if you read a few of them. More than enough to make
>you feel comfortable, in my expereience.
>
Ummm....
Reasons why I prefer discrete components.
1) A designer should be familiar with discrete circuit disegn
techniques , something he/she loses when using integrated circuits.
2)You compromise circuit flexibility when you use an integrated
circuit
3)Discrete communication circuits are superior to integrated circuits
in performance.
><snipped bad advice>
>
Your Proof?
I disagree.
Its a well known fact that MOS/FET are superior to BJT mixers.
Try reading something on that.
"Go easy on the whisky"
theJackal
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: analog multiplier help
- From: bill . sloman
- Re: analog multiplier help
- References:
- analog multiplier help
- From: Adam S
- Re: analog multiplier help
- From: theJackal
- Re: analog multiplier help
- From: bill . sloman
- analog multiplier help
- Prev by Date: Re: Radio Link
- Next by Date: Re: "Analog hole" legislation introduced
- Previous by thread: Re: analog multiplier help
- Next by thread: Re: analog multiplier help
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|