Re: "Analog hole" legislation introduced
- From: Chris Carlen <crcarleRemoveThis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 08:46:49 -0800
John Larkin wrote:
On 19 Dec 2005 09:43:45 -0800, Winfield Hill <Winfield_member@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Anyway, stop changing the subject: Fair use is being able to
record a TV show and watch it the next day. That's the long-
established "SONY principle." I have a very busy schedule,
and usually can't watch a program when its broadcast.
They fought the VCR then and lost, now they may not lose.
So hang onto your VCR.
"Section 201 (b) (1) of the DTCSA gives you only 90 minutes from the initial reception of a "unit of content" to watch your recordings."
Wake up, John. I recommend you avoid a blanket acceptance of everything your fine Republican government is up to these days. California has six Judiciary Committee members, I suggest you write each one a quick note. You can use cut and paste. http://judiciary.house.gov/CommitteeMembership.aspx
I count 5 Democrats and three Repubs on that committee from California. And it's Democrats that are mostly in the pockets and pay of Hollywood. So why blame "your fine Republican government" here?
Ultimately it will be up to the courts to re-interpret fair use.
Personally, if someone creates IP, I figure they should protect it any way they choose. If you want to slice out the commercials that fund the broadcasts, and they want to try to stop you, I can't see that they are wrong. If they make watching their crap too much trouble, I'll not watch it... I hardly do anyway. That's the way markets work... if you don't like the product, buy something else.
John
It isn't a "market" when the choices available to the consumer are dictated by the political system. You would be right if the content producers simply employed technology of their own choosing to protect their content. Instead they are seeking to use the government to prevent any other options from being available on the market. So "buy something else" isn't going to be an option if they get their way.
This is not a free market, and won't be as long as Republican or Democrat statists are involved.
-- Good day!
________________________________________ Christopher R. Carlen Principal Laser&Electronics Technologist Sandia National Laboratories CA USA crcarleRemoveThis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx NOTE, delete texts: "RemoveThis" and "BOGUS" from email address to reply. .
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: "Analog hole" legislation introduced
- From: Keith
- Re: "Analog hole" legislation introduced
- From: John Larkin
- Re: "Analog hole" legislation introduced
- References:
- "Analog hole" legislation introduced
- From: Winfield Hill
- Re: "Analog hole" legislation introduced
- From: John Larkin
- Re: "Analog hole" legislation introduced
- From: Winfield Hill
- Re: "Analog hole" legislation introduced
- From: John Larkin
- "Analog hole" legislation introduced
- Prev by Date: Re: OT: Political dead horse
- Next by Date: Re: OT: Political dead horse
- Previous by thread: Re: "Analog hole" legislation introduced
- Next by thread: Re: "Analog hole" legislation introduced
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|