Re: "Analog hole" legislation introduced
- From: Keith Williams <krw@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 14:27:03 -0500
In article <40tnjgF1bv8i2U1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, rphenry@xxxxxxxx
says...
>
> "Keith Williams" <krw@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:MPG.1e1369ea2ac11f7798976d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > Ah, breaking the law is ok, if you really, really, (...) don't like
> > the law.
>
> What are you, a Republican or something?
>
Sure. Are you an idiot or something?
--
Keith
.
- References:
- "Analog hole" legislation introduced
- From: Winfield Hill
- Re: "Analog hole" legislation introduced
- From: John Larkin
- Re: "Analog hole" legislation introduced
- From: Winfield Hill
- Re: "Analog hole" legislation introduced
- From: John Larkin
- Re: "Analog hole" legislation introduced
- From: Chris Carlen
- Re: "Analog hole" legislation introduced
- From: John Larkin
- Re: "Analog hole" legislation introduced
- From: John Devereux
- Re: "Analog hole" legislation introduced
- From: Jim Thompson
- Re: "Analog hole" legislation introduced
- From: John Devereux
- Re: "Analog hole" legislation introduced
- From: Jim Thompson
- Re: "Analog hole" legislation introduced
- From: Keith Williams
- Re: "Analog hole" legislation introduced
- From: Richard Henry
- "Analog hole" legislation introduced
- Prev by Date: Re: "Analog hole" legislation introduced
- Next by Date: Re: Computer programmers' habits in electronics
- Previous by thread: Re: "Analog hole" legislation introduced
- Next by thread: Re: "Analog hole" legislation introduced
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|