Re: why does this newsgroup have beasts
- From: bill.sloman@xxxxxxxx
- Date: 21 Dec 2005 17:20:48 -0800
Rick wrote:
> "theJackal" <f_a_s_t_g_s_f_r_i_d_e_r@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:gkkjq1531v6cld5b0vgvgg8d3oi3es07ie@xxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >
> > Anybody got a theory on the above?
>
>
> Not sure, but I wish it had more breasts (as opposed to boobs)
What use is a breast on a text-only user-group?
A boob you can at least subject to a hard time to discourage other
boobs (and perhaps encourage the non-boobs to raise their game).
We could do with more civilising influences, but the one's we've got
don't seem to get much credit for their efforts.
--------------------
Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: why does this newsgroup have beasts
- From: Paul Burridge
- Re: why does this newsgroup have beasts
- From: Rich Grise, but drunk
- Re: why does this newsgroup have beasts
- From: theJackal
- Re: why does this newsgroup have beasts
- References:
- why does this newsgroup have beasts
- From: theJackal
- Re: why does this newsgroup have beasts
- From: Rick
- why does this newsgroup have beasts
- Prev by Date: Re: Something we can all agree on
- Next by Date: Re: Something we can all agree on
- Previous by thread: Re: why does this newsgroup have beasts
- Next by thread: Re: why does this newsgroup have beasts
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading