Re: why does this newsgroup have beasts
- From: John Larkin <jjlarkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 12:10:16 -0800
On Sat, 24 Dec 2005 19:54:22 +0100, Paul Burridge
<pb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>On 21 Dec 2005 17:20:48 -0800, bill.sloman@xxxxxxxx wrote:
>
>>We could do with more civilising influences, but the one's we've got
>>don't seem to get much credit for their efforts.
>
>And that would be *you* would it, Bill??
Read "civilizing influences" as "sufficiently pompous insults."
John
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: why does this newsgroup have beasts
- From: Rich Grise, but drunk
- Re: why does this newsgroup have beasts
- From: bill . sloman
- Re: why does this newsgroup have beasts
- References:
- why does this newsgroup have beasts
- From: theJackal
- Re: why does this newsgroup have beasts
- From: Rick
- Re: why does this newsgroup have beasts
- From: bill . sloman
- Re: why does this newsgroup have beasts
- From: Paul Burridge
- why does this newsgroup have beasts
- Prev by Date: Iron Man
- Next by Date: Re: pushbutton switches/555 timer
- Previous by thread: Re: why does this newsgroup have beasts
- Next by thread: Re: why does this newsgroup have beasts
- Index(es):
Loading