Re: why does this newsgroup have beasts
- From: John Larkin <jjlarkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 18:37:36 -0800
On Tue, 27 Dec 2005 01:00:21 GMT, "Rich Grise, but drunk"
<yahright@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>On Sat, 24 Dec 2005 12:10:16 -0800, John Larkin wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 24 Dec 2005 19:54:22 +0100, Paul Burridge
>> <pb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>>On 21 Dec 2005 17:20:48 -0800, bill.sloman@xxxxxxxx wrote:
>>>
>>>>We could do with more civilising influences, but the one's we've got
>>>>don't seem to get much credit for their efforts.
>>>
>>>And that would be *you* would it, Bill??
>>
>> Read "civilizing influences" as "sufficiently pompous insults."
>>
>> John
>
>Oh, come on, John! You, of all people, should know that in order for
>a person to be pompous, they have to have something to pomp!
>
OK, OK, good point. Sorry.
John
.
- References:
- why does this newsgroup have beasts
- From: theJackal
- Re: why does this newsgroup have beasts
- From: Rick
- Re: why does this newsgroup have beasts
- From: bill . sloman
- Re: why does this newsgroup have beasts
- From: Paul Burridge
- Re: why does this newsgroup have beasts
- From: John Larkin
- Re: why does this newsgroup have beasts
- From: Rich Grise, but drunk
- why does this newsgroup have beasts
- Prev by Date: Re: High current voltage regulator
- Next by Date: Re: Trying to understand how to design circuits
- Previous by thread: Re: why does this newsgroup have beasts
- Next by thread: Re: why does this newsgroup have beasts
- Index(es):