Re: Tiny PCBs - score, route, or ?
- From: "Richard H." <rh86@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 23:03:03 -0700
qrk wrote:
I have posted a PDF in alt.binaries.schematics.electronic of a tab layout I like to use.
Got it - thanks! Real-world examples make great references.
I make the tab a footprint so the board house won't make a silly choice.
I'm not following you on this one - what do you mean by footprint? Meaning you spec the routing pattern as a layer (which I'd plan to do)?
Position the tab away from resistors and capacitors as they are susceptable to cracking if they are too near the breakaway point.
Makes sense. I'm planning to have PTH connectors closest to the edge, but how far back do you recommend keeping SMD from the snap? Is 0.03" enough?
This particular panel was run thru Circuit Express <http://www.circuitexpress.com/>, a prototyping house, due to customer request. I normally use US Circuit <http://www.uscircuit.com/> for small to medium runs.
Also great info. Neither of these were on my list of ~40 vendors to check with.
Thanks! Richard .
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Tiny PCBs - score, route, or ?
- From: qrk
- Re: Tiny PCBs - score, route, or ?
- References:
- Tiny PCBs - score, route, or ?
- From: Richard H.
- Re: Tiny PCBs - score, route, or ?
- From: qrk
- Re: Tiny PCBs - score, route, or ?
- From: Richard H.
- Re: Tiny PCBs - score, route, or ?
- From: qrk
- Tiny PCBs - score, route, or ?
- Prev by Date: Re: remote antenna for DCF77 clock
- Next by Date: Re: Tiny PCBs - score, route, or ?
- Previous by thread: Re: Tiny PCBs - score, route, or ?
- Next by thread: Re: Tiny PCBs - score, route, or ?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|