Re: OT: Political dead horse

On Sat, 31 Dec 2005 04:45:08 +0000, John S. Dyson wrote:
> In article <96uar11dbr593qjjimi7v406ia22112dfs@xxxxxxx>,
> John Larkin <jjlarkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> On 29 Dec 2005 17:01:14 -0800, Winfield Hill
>> <Winfield_member@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> More meaningless BS from John S. Dyson.
>>
>> Well, what's the information content in *that*?
>>
> All it means is that Winfield is unable to refute the fact
> that much of the American left (he is apparently a leftist) is almost
> perfectly intellectually dishonest.

No, the problem is that nobody's been able to talk any sense into
your head.

Thanks,
Rich
--
"We have met the enemy and he is us." - Pogo Possum

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: The Rational Mind of Fred Bloggs
    ... John Fields wrote... ... Dyson, you write such bigotry here all the while acting like the injured ... is perfectly entitled to be "strongly against" Bush. ... There are adequate reasons for rational people to strongly oppose Bush ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
  • Re: OT: Political dead horse
    ... >> John S. Dyson wrote... ... You probably don't mean to be a liar and your apparent ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
  • Re: History
    ... John you are still avoiding the issue. ... Posting your little conglomeration of lies will not make them go away. ... Refute them or kindly shut up ... to be irrelevant to any discussion dealing with the lottery. ...
    (rec.gambling.lottery)
  • Re: OT: Political dead horse
    ... Jim Thompson wrote: ... >>John S. Dyson wrote... ... Bill Sloman, Nijmegen ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
  • Re: TOT: Cartoon about atheists
    ... entire response we're seeing is a way of avoiding the hard question, ... John P ... The problem is, you can't refute something that is based on faith, ...
    (rec.arts.mystery)