Re: OT: Political dead horse
- From: kensmith@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Ken Smith)
- Date: Sun, 1 Jan 2006 17:08:58 +0000 (UTC)
In article <k3fer1doueq5oveepu3fvrlrl8n7bsrmia@xxxxxxx>,
John Larkin <jjlarkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[...]
>Why do you call him a liar? He's probably as candid as the average US
>president, and certainly more than the last one.
Maybe, you get that impression because he is a much better liar. If we
imagine that W was the perfect liar, his lies would never be discovered
and thus he would appear to be perfectly honest.
When Mr. Bill waged his finger at the camera and said "I did not have sex
with that woman ...", many people suspected right away that this was not
the truth.
--
--
kensmith@xxxxxxxxx forging knowledge
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OT: Political dead horse
- From: Richard the Dreaded Libertarian
- Re: OT: Political dead horse
- From: John Larkin
- Re: OT: Political dead horse
- From: Richard Henry
- Re: OT: Political dead horse
- References:
- Re: OT: Political dead horse
- From: Winfield Hill
- Re: OT: Political dead horse
- From: John Larkin
- Re: OT: Political dead horse
- Prev by Date: Re: Something we can all agree on
- Next by Date: Re: Something we can all agree on
- Previous by thread: Re: OT: Political dead horse
- Next by thread: Re: OT: Political dead horse
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
