Re: A Very Dangerous Worm in Windows Metafile Images (WMF)
- From: "Frithiof Andreas Jensen" <frithiof.jensen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2006 16:15:10 +0100
"Winfield Hill" <Winfield_member@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:dpb1t7010hb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Frank Bemelman wrote...
> >
> > Mike Monett wrote...
> >
> >> This is a very serious problem. Watch the internet melt
> >> tomorrow when everyone comes back from XMas vacation.
> >
> > Hahahahaha.....
>
> Most of us don't visit malicious web pages.
"Knowingly" or maybe "Deliberately" lacking from that overly confident
assertion; There are relatively trivial and well known ways to send your
legitimate requests to any malicious web pages/content required!!
It is a design feature of IPv4 and also IPv6 that the local network segment
is implicitly trusted - as is DNS - so all it takes is for ONE person on the
same network segment as you to slip up (or for said person feeling the urge
to flash his laptop on a WiFi LAN in the Airport lounge and bringing it
inside the firewall loaded with "freebies").
The odds for that are good since "Most ..." != "All".
.
- References:
- A Very Dangerous Worm in Windows Metafile Images (WMF)
- From: Mike Monett
- Re: A Very Dangerous Worm in Windows Metafile Images (WMF)
- From: Mike Monett
- Re: A Very Dangerous Worm in Windows Metafile Images (WMF)
- From: JeffM
- Re: A Very Dangerous Worm in Windows Metafile Images (WMF)
- From: Mike Monett
- Re: A Very Dangerous Worm in Windows Metafile Images (WMF)
- From: Frank Bemelman
- Re: A Very Dangerous Worm in Windows Metafile Images (WMF)
- From: Winfield Hill
- A Very Dangerous Worm in Windows Metafile Images (WMF)
- Prev by Date: Re: A Very Dangerous Worm in Windows Metafile Images (WMF)
- Next by Date: Re: 2-line ,,,single line phone?
- Previous by thread: Re: A Very Dangerous Worm in Windows Metafile Images (WMF)
- Next by thread: Re: A Very Dangerous Worm in Windows Metafile Images (WMF)
- Index(es):