Re: OT: Political dead horse
- From: Richard the Dreaded Libertarian <eatmyshorts@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2006 19:46:51 GMT
On Sun, 01 Jan 2006 17:08:58 +0000, Ken Smith wrote:
> In article <k3fer1doueq5oveepu3fvrlrl8n7bsrmia@xxxxxxx>,
> John Larkin <jjlarkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> [...]
>>Why do you call him a liar? He's probably as candid as the average US
>>president, and certainly more than the last one.
>
> Maybe, you get that impression because he is a much better liar. If we
> imagine that W was the perfect liar, his lies would never be discovered
> and thus he would appear to be perfectly honest.
>
> When Mr. Bill waged his finger at the camera and said "I did not have sex
> with that woman ...", many people suspected right away that this was not
> the truth.
>
I don't believe Mister Dubya is clever enough to be a liar. He's not even
very good at reading the lines that they _do_ feed him.
The thing that really frightens me is, who's behind the scenes pulling his
strings?
Thanks,
Rich
--
"We have met the enemy and he is us." - Pogo Possum
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OT: Political dead horse
- From: John Larkin
- Re: OT: Political dead horse
- References:
- Re: OT: Political dead horse
- From: Winfield Hill
- Re: OT: Political dead horse
- From: John Larkin
- Re: OT: Political dead horse
- From: Ken Smith
- Re: OT: Political dead horse
- Prev by Date: Re: Super OT: America - the good and the, um, room for improvement
- Next by Date: Re: OT: Political dead horse
- Previous by thread: Re: OT: Political dead horse
- Next by thread: Re: OT: Political dead horse
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|