Re: A Very Dangerous Worm in Windows Metafile Images (WMF)
- From: Bob Monsen <rcsurname@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2006 13:40:03 -0800
On Mon, 02 Jan 2006 15:43:30 +0000, Rich Grise wrote:
> On Mon, 02 Jan 2006 03:40:50 -0800, Mike Monett wrote:
>
>> The IM worm that was released yesterday was "http://[snip]/xmas-2006
>> FUNNY.jpg".
>
> Aww, c'mon! Post the whole URL, with warnings, so I can go look at it -
> I'm running Linux, so I don't get worms. ;-P
>
Nautilus whines if you try to open a WMF which has the wrong extension. It
only lets you do it by selecting the application, and the warning
indicates that the file can do damage.
I wouldn't trust linux to protect you on on this one, particularly if you
like to run as root.
--
Regards,
Bob Monsen
"Physiological experiment on animals is justifiable for real
investigation, but not for mere damnable and detestable curiosity."
-- Charles Darwin
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: A Very Dangerous Worm in Windows Metafile Images (WMF)
- From: Ian Bell
- Re: A Very Dangerous Worm in Windows Metafile Images (WMF)
- From: Rich Grise, but drunk
- Re: A Very Dangerous Worm in Windows Metafile Images (WMF)
- From: David Brown
- Re: A Very Dangerous Worm in Windows Metafile Images (WMF)
- References:
- A Very Dangerous Worm in Windows Metafile Images (WMF)
- From: Mike Monett
- Re: A Very Dangerous Worm in Windows Metafile Images (WMF)
- From: John Larkin
- Re: A Very Dangerous Worm in Windows Metafile Images (WMF)
- From: Mike Monett
- Re: A Very Dangerous Worm in Windows Metafile Images (WMF)
- From: Rich Grise
- A Very Dangerous Worm in Windows Metafile Images (WMF)
- Prev by Date: Re: Missive
- Next by Date: Re: OT: Political dead horse
- Previous by thread: Re: A Very Dangerous Worm in Windows Metafile Images (WMF)
- Next by thread: Re: A Very Dangerous Worm in Windows Metafile Images (WMF)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading