Re: A Very Dangerous Worm in Windows Metafile Images (WMF)
- From: John Larkin <jjlarkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2006 09:29:16 -0800
On 3 Jan 2006 17:39:30 -0800, Winfield Hill
<Winfield_member@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>Rich Grise wrote...
>>
>> The whole thing could probably be nipped in the bud, and most
>> viruses, worms, and such, if people could be taught to not do
>> their day-to-day stuff while logged in as administrator...
>
> I dunno, while XP home machines are used that way by default,
> most W2000 and XP-pro machines are not, yet they're vulnerable
> too. Perhaps that's because all execute the WMF code. BTW,
> over-writing of system files isn't required to get infected.
One of Bill's declared tenents of "trusted computing" was "safe by
default." Why does Windows default to executing .jpg files as wmf's?
Irfanview checks and warns me if the extension doesn't match the
header; Windows doesn't. Windows doesn't even allow me to turn on such
checking.
200 million lines of crap.
John
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: A Very Dangerous Worm in Windows Metafile Images (WMF)
- From: John Doe
- Re: A Very Dangerous Worm in Windows Metafile Images (WMF)
- References:
- Re: A Very Dangerous Worm in Windows Metafile Images (WMF)
- From: Mike Monett
- Re: A Very Dangerous Worm in Windows Metafile Images (WMF)
- From: JeffM
- Re: A Very Dangerous Worm in Windows Metafile Images (WMF)
- From: Mike Monett
- Re: A Very Dangerous Worm in Windows Metafile Images (WMF)
- From: Frank Bemelman
- Re: A Very Dangerous Worm in Windows Metafile Images (WMF)
- From: Winfield Hill
- Re: A Very Dangerous Worm in Windows Metafile Images (WMF)
- From: Pooh Bear
- Re: A Very Dangerous Worm in Windows Metafile Images (WMF)
- From: Winfield Hill
- Re: A Very Dangerous Worm in Windows Metafile Images (WMF)
- From: Pooh Bear
- Re: A Very Dangerous Worm in Windows Metafile Images (WMF)
- From: Winfield Hill
- Re: A Very Dangerous Worm in Windows Metafile Images (WMF)
- From: Frank Bemelman
- Re: A Very Dangerous Worm in Windows Metafile Images (WMF)
- From: Winfield Hill
- Re: A Very Dangerous Worm in Windows Metafile Images (WMF)
- From: Rich Grise
- Re: A Very Dangerous Worm in Windows Metafile Images (WMF)
- From: Winfield Hill
- Re: A Very Dangerous Worm in Windows Metafile Images (WMF)
- Prev by Date: Re: RMS and Average Current
- Next by Date: Re: A Very Dangerous Worm in Windows Metafile Images (WMF)
- Previous by thread: Re: A Very Dangerous Worm in Windows Metafile Images (WMF)
- Next by thread: Re: A Very Dangerous Worm in Windows Metafile Images (WMF)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|