Re: A Very Dangerous Worm in Windows Metafile Images (WMF)
- From: "Frank Bemelman" <f.bemelmanq@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 19:51:17 +0100
"Richard Henry" <rphenry@xxxxxxxx> schreef in bericht
news:422ib0F1gtlufU1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> "John Doe" <jdoe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:Xns9741792C131BCfollydom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > John Larkin <jjlarkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > > Irfanview checks and warns me if the extension doesn't match the
> > > header; Windows doesn't.
> >
> > I think Windows XP does. Or you might at least get a warning that
> > you're about to run a program. You do for files with a proper EXE
> > extension, so I cannot imagine otherwise.
>
> I could not imagine a lot of software weaknesses until they were
> demonstrated in MS products.
Yes, but the alternative, Linux, stinks even more. Typical Linux
distributions come with more CD's than windows. Linux bloatware.
The extensions not matching headers is nothing to be worried
about. In the old days, where you had uncompressed bitmaps and
simple compressed gifs, life was easy. *.BMP and *.GIF and that
was that. Now we have so many different graphical file formats,
that it is a neccesity to store many different formats under one
extension. Same with movie files. Under *.AVI you will find many
different formats.
JL talks from his arse. He thinks he knows enough about software
to be able to make a judgement. He can barely control a 1x16
character display on his outdated 68000 stuff.
Linux is going to take over the world, is the repeating message
we hear for years and years now. The internet was going to melt
yesterday. Yeah, sure.
--
Thanks, Frank.
(remove 'q' and '.invalid' when replying by email)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: A Very Dangerous Worm in Windows Metafile Images (WMF)
- From: Ted Edwards
- Re: A Very Dangerous Worm in Windows Metafile Images (WMF)
- From: John Devereux
- Re: A Very Dangerous Worm in Windows Metafile Images (WMF)
- From: John Larkin
- Re: A Very Dangerous Worm in Windows Metafile Images (WMF)
- From: dagmargoodboat
- Re: A Very Dangerous Worm in Windows Metafile Images (WMF)
- References:
- Re: A Very Dangerous Worm in Windows Metafile Images (WMF)
- From: Mike Monett
- Re: A Very Dangerous Worm in Windows Metafile Images (WMF)
- From: JeffM
- Re: A Very Dangerous Worm in Windows Metafile Images (WMF)
- From: Mike Monett
- Re: A Very Dangerous Worm in Windows Metafile Images (WMF)
- From: Frank Bemelman
- Re: A Very Dangerous Worm in Windows Metafile Images (WMF)
- From: Winfield Hill
- Re: A Very Dangerous Worm in Windows Metafile Images (WMF)
- From: Pooh Bear
- Re: A Very Dangerous Worm in Windows Metafile Images (WMF)
- From: Winfield Hill
- Re: A Very Dangerous Worm in Windows Metafile Images (WMF)
- From: Pooh Bear
- Re: A Very Dangerous Worm in Windows Metafile Images (WMF)
- From: Winfield Hill
- Re: A Very Dangerous Worm in Windows Metafile Images (WMF)
- From: Frank Bemelman
- Re: A Very Dangerous Worm in Windows Metafile Images (WMF)
- From: Winfield Hill
- Re: A Very Dangerous Worm in Windows Metafile Images (WMF)
- From: Rich Grise
- Re: A Very Dangerous Worm in Windows Metafile Images (WMF)
- From: Winfield Hill
- Re: A Very Dangerous Worm in Windows Metafile Images (WMF)
- From: John Larkin
- Re: A Very Dangerous Worm in Windows Metafile Images (WMF)
- From: John Doe
- Re: A Very Dangerous Worm in Windows Metafile Images (WMF)
- From: Richard Henry
- Re: A Very Dangerous Worm in Windows Metafile Images (WMF)
- Prev by Date: Re: A Very Dangerous Worm in Windows Metafile Images (WMF)
- Next by Date: Re: A Very Dangerous Worm in Windows Metafile Images (WMF)
- Previous by thread: Re: A Very Dangerous Worm in Windows Metafile Images (WMF)
- Next by thread: Re: A Very Dangerous Worm in Windows Metafile Images (WMF)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading