Re: Analog Hole Bill Would Require Secret Tech No One Can Examine



On 23 Jan 2006 17:49:41 -0800, Winfield Hill
<Winfield_member@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>The upcoming Analog Hole bill would require secret, expensive
>technology that no one can examine, and or talk about if they
>have, even after paying a $10,000 fee, according to techdirt,
>http://techdirt.com/articles/20060123/1352234_F.shtml

They'll never make it mandatory for general-purpose sar adc chips to
search for watermarks. And you can always make an audio-quality [1]
delta-sigma in an FPGA. But why do you think it important to be able
to bootleg someone else's intellectual property? If you don't like the
product, don't buy it.

John

[1] whatever that means.


.



Relevant Pages