Re: Analog Hole Bill Would Require Secret Tech No One Can Examine
- From: John Larkin <jjlarkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 12:28:11 -0800
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 11:36:02 -0800, John Miles
<jmiles@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>They're not just attaching it to their IP, John, as has been explained
>to you numerous times. By making it illegal to sell certain pieces of
>hardware, they're attaching whatever technical protections they desire
>to _YOUR_ IP.
>
How? Are you suggesting that, say, it will be mandatory to sell CD
players and PC sound chips that will play *only* watermarked CDs? I
don't think that will happen, for a lot of reasons.
John
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Analog Hole Bill Would Require Secret Tech No One Can Examine
- From: John Miles
- Re: Analog Hole Bill Would Require Secret Tech No One Can Examine
- References:
- Analog Hole Bill Would Require Secret Tech No One Can Examine
- From: Winfield Hill
- Re: Analog Hole Bill Would Require Secret Tech No One Can Examine
- From: John Larkin
- Re: Analog Hole Bill Would Require Secret Tech No One Can Examine
- From: cs_posting
- Re: Analog Hole Bill Would Require Secret Tech No One Can Examine
- From: John Larkin
- Re: Analog Hole Bill Would Require Secret Tech No One Can Examine
- From: John Miles
- Analog Hole Bill Would Require Secret Tech No One Can Examine
- Prev by Date: Re: The Origin Of Arrogance
- Next by Date: Re: Favorite electronics movies
- Previous by thread: Re: Analog Hole Bill Would Require Secret Tech No One Can Examine
- Next by thread: Re: Analog Hole Bill Would Require Secret Tech No One Can Examine
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|