Re: Analog Hole Bill Would Require Secret Tech No One Can Examine

From: Rich Grise <richgrise@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 21:58:48 GMT

On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 20:33:43 -0800, John Larkin wrote:

> I think what most people fear is that their ability to bootleg IP will
> be diminished, and they'll have to pay for all the stuff they listen
> to for 16 hours a day, as they rot their brains and destroy their
> hearing.

When I want to listen to music for free, I just turn on the radio. ;-)

The other day I heard a fairly cool announcement on a local radio station:
"Free Radio 97.5<or whatever it was>".

Cheers!
Rich

.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Analog Hole Bill Would Require Secret Tech No One Can Examine
  - From: Andy Peters

References:
- Analog Hole Bill Would Require Secret Tech No One Can Examine
  - From: Winfield Hill
- Re: Analog Hole Bill Would Require Secret Tech No One Can Examine
  - From: John Larkin
- Re: Analog Hole Bill Would Require Secret Tech No One Can Examine
  - From: cs_posting
- Re: Analog Hole Bill Would Require Secret Tech No One Can Examine
  - From: John Larkin

Prev by Date: Re: Analog Hole Bill Would Require Secret Tech No One Can Examine
Next by Date: Re: O.T. HP laptop
Previous by thread: Re: Analog Hole Bill Would Require Secret Tech No One Can Examine
Next by thread: Re: Analog Hole Bill Would Require Secret Tech No One Can Examine
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread