Re: Infrared RC oscillator
- From: Ben Bradley <ben_nospam_bradley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 22:48:59 GMT
On Wed, 11 Jan 2006 23:09:16 GMT, Mike Harrison <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
>On Wed, 11 Jan 2006 15:05:22 -0500, "Michael" <newszz10@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>So many of the xmtr circuits I've seen for infrared remote control use a
>>crystal or ceramic resonator in a cmos oscillator.
>>
>>Is there any reason why an R/C network oscillator using low tolerance parts
>>wouldn't be accurate enough at such a low frequency?
>>(38 or 40 khz).
>
>Just because the frequency is low doesn't mean the accuracy required is any less. In practice it
>gets tricky getting RC repeatability better then about 5%, especially where supply voltage is likely
>to be variable, partly due to the high pulse currents driving the IR LED.
Actually a circuit using a 555 timer will have pretty good immunity
to voltage variations, OTOH the 555 may cost as much as a ceramic
resonator, and the frequency is still dependent on high-tolerance and
temperature-varying resistors and capacitors.
>A 5% frequency error will
>put the carrier far enough out of band for some IR sensors to reduce range noticeably.
>Resonators are cheap and stable and provide the best solution for this application - the proof of
>this is simply that it's what's almost universally used in an extremely price-sensitive market.
.
- References:
- Re: Infrared RC oscillator
- From: Mike Harrison
- Re: Infrared RC oscillator
- Prev by Date: Re: Summery Re: Frequency signal multiplier - repost.
- Next by Date: Re: How do i make "volume" work in HTML?
- Previous by thread: Re: Infrared RC oscillator
- Next by thread: HCI effect in detail
- Index(es):