Re: Is there a dual equivalent to the quad LP324?
- From: Spehro Pefhany <speffSNIP@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2006 16:22:26 -0500
On Wed, 01 Feb 2006 20:54:09 GMT, the renowned Joerg <notthisjoergsch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >Hello Frithiof Andreas, > >>> >>>There is. But what's wrong with it? >> >> That some versions of it will slam rail-to-to rail pulses out when common >> mode crosses zero - if one naively uses it as a sense amplifier f.ex. not >> all, some parts. >> >> >You have to remain within data *** specs, can't go below zero. You can go below zero, just not too much below zero. Best regards, Spehro Pefhany -- "it's the network..." "The Journey is the reward" speff@xxxxxxxxxxxx Info for manufacturers: http://www.trexon.com Embedded software/hardware/analog Info for designers: http://www.speff.com .
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is there a dual equivalent to the quad LP324?
- From: Joerg
- Re: Is there a dual equivalent to the quad LP324?
- From: John Devereux
- Re: Is there a dual equivalent to the quad LP324?
- References:
- Is there a dual equivalent to the quad LP324?
- From: Joerg
- Re: Is there a dual equivalent to the quad LP324?
- From: Pooh Bear
- Re: Is there a dual equivalent to the quad LP324?
- From: Jorgen Lund-Nielsen
- Re: Is there a dual equivalent to the quad LP324?
- From: Joerg
- Re: Is there a dual equivalent to the quad LP324?
- From: Frithiof Andreas Jensen
- Re: Is there a dual equivalent to the quad LP324?
- From: Joerg
- Is there a dual equivalent to the quad LP324?
- Prev by Date: Re: Ultra low power / current (<250uA) LEDs
- Next by Date: Re: OT: Groundhog day
- Previous by thread: Re: Is there a dual equivalent to the quad LP324?
- Next by thread: Re: Is there a dual equivalent to the quad LP324?
- Index(es):