Re: Using RTC on its Own
- From: "SioL" <Sio_spam_L@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2006 13:07:19 +0100
"Richard H." <rh86@xxxxxxx> wrote in message news:y5BFf.55691$V.36896@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Nick wrote:
I am using it for Maintanence purpose (Machine Lubrication). My machine
needs lubrication after 500hrs hours of working. Earlier i thought of
using an electronic timer but that would cost too much. Hence i thought
of using the RTC without Microcontroller.
Nick,
Perhaps you think microcontrollers are too expensive? It looks like they may be cheaper than the RTC you're using.
Perhaps he never used them before and prefers a fully HW solution without the
need to write any SW?
--
Siol
------------------------------------------------
Rather than a heartless beep
Or a rude error message,
See these simple words: "File not found."
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Using RTC on its Own
- From: Anthony Fremont
- Re: Using RTC on its Own
- References:
- Using RTC on its Own
- From: Nick
- Re: Using RTC on its Own
- From: Geo
- Re: Using RTC on its Own
- From: electronic-eng.com
- Re: Using RTC on its Own
- From: Nick
- Re: Using RTC on its Own
- From: Richard H.
- Using RTC on its Own
- Prev by Date: Re: Using RTC on its Own
- Next by Date: Re: HDTV has no "Analog Audio Output"
- Previous by thread: Re: Using RTC on its Own
- Next by thread: Re: Using RTC on its Own
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
