Re: Initializing a Flip-Flop on Power-up
- From: Spehro Pefhany <speffSNIP@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 20:08:42 -0500
On Fri, 17 Feb 2006 14:40:53 -0700, the renowned Jim Thompson
<To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, 17 Feb 2006 21:26:39 GMT, Joerg
<notthisjoergsch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[snip]
[snip]
Spending an extra 4-5 cents doesn't sound like you, what have you been
drinking this afternoon? ;)
Oh, just coffee. But not the Douwe Egberts brand :-(
Douwe Egbert makes coffee too? I used to smoke their Cavendish until
the management decreed no smoking in the new house ;-)
Personal opinion: Anyone who relies on an edge detector for POR is a
bit of a fool. In recent months it's been an almost weekly event to
patch some chip that won't POR properly.
I bet. This kind of thing can cause annoyance and much more serious
things in the field.
I prefer a level detect with hysteresis AND delay... easy to do if the
chip design includes my bandgap reference ;-)
...Jim Thompson
How does your bandgap compare with published single/double bandgap
references? Curvature correction PTAT term added?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Initializing a Flip-Flop on Power-up
- From: Jim Thompson
- Re: Initializing a Flip-Flop on Power-up
- References:
- Initializing a Flip-Flop on Power-up
- From: Dan Charette
- Re: Initializing a Flip-Flop on Power-up
- From: Spehro Pefhany
- Re: Initializing a Flip-Flop on Power-up
- From: Joerg
- Re: Initializing a Flip-Flop on Power-up
- From: Frank Bemelman
- Re: Initializing a Flip-Flop on Power-up
- From: Joerg
- Re: Initializing a Flip-Flop on Power-up
- From: Jim Thompson
- Initializing a Flip-Flop on Power-up
- Prev by Date: Re: Advice on Digital Oscilloscope Design
- Next by Date: Re: Initializing a Flip-Flop on Power-up
- Previous by thread: Re: Initializing a Flip-Flop on Power-up
- Next by thread: Re: Initializing a Flip-Flop on Power-up
- Index(es):