Re: Why be such an ***?

On Tue, 28 Feb 2006 19:49:11 -0700, Jim Thompson
<To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Wed, 01 Mar 2006 02:03:38 GMT, Fred Bloggs <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

You are not required to read and respond to every bit of fluff
commentary any old joe blow idiot chooses to post to your thread. It is
understood that USENET is loaded with sociopathic individuals of
congenitally diminished mental capacity, posers, psychopaths, delusional
schizoids, wannabes, psychopathic narcissists (you know who you are:-),
egomaniacs (you know who you are:-),and innumerable other categories of
discard along the same vein ( you know who you are:-). Most of these
people are affectionately known as "characters." The keywords are
unmoderated *public* forum, so get over it or go find a seriously and
responsibly *moderated* NG.

I prefer the term "eccentric" ;-)

Though I do recall dressing up in a tux one time and my daughters aged
9 and 6 at the time allowed as how Dad looked "extinguished" ;-)

---
Soon, perhaps...

--
John Fields
Professional Circuit Designer
.