Re: How to review ME's design from EE point of view?
- From: Rich Grise <richgrise@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2006 19:12:31 GMT
On Mon, 27 Feb 2006 18:53:13 -0800, Paul Hovnanian P.E. wrote:
Mark Fergerson wrote:
Pooh Bear wrote:
--------------just what you agreed to do. I'm talking about the marketing folks
who'll blow gaskets when told "The package will have to be bigger",
"The vents have to go here instead of where your artist put them", "You
can't put the buttons/lights/slots/power cord/etc there", and stuff
like that.
MEs and EEs get along pretty well on most issues. Its the architects
that cause the problems.
"What do you mean you can't fit something called '35 kV switchgear' into
a broom closet?"
A doctor, an architect, and a computer scientist were arguing about
whose profession was the oldest. In the course of their arguments,
they got all the way back to the Garden of Eden, whereupon the doctor
said, "The medical profession is clearly the oldest, because Eve was
made from Adam's rib, as the story goes, and that was a simply
incredible surgical feat."
The architect did not agree. He said, "But if you look at the Garden
itself, in the beginning there was chaos and void, and out of that, the
Garden and the world were created. So God must have been an architect."
The computer scientist, who had listened to all of this said, "Yes, but
where do you think the chaos came from?"
---------------
;-)
Cheers!
Rich
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: How to review ME's design from EE point of view?
- From: Joseph2k
- Re: How to review ME's design from EE point of view?
- Prev by Date: Re: Why be such an ***?
- Next by Date: Re: Why be such an ***?
- Previous by thread: Another patent Q
- Next by thread: Re: How to review ME's design from EE point of view?
- Index(es):