Re: GPS trackers - a potential weapon from hell
- From: Joseph2k <joseph2k@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 04:21:53 GMT
Ken Taylor wrote:
reply interstitial.
"Joseph2k" <joseph2k@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:b7QPf.50065$Jd.42709@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Frithiof Andreas Jensen wrote:on
"Paul Hovnanian P.E." <Paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:43FFC437.15D70A44@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Richard the Dreaded Libertarian wrote:
[snip]
Well, if cell phones can work from inside an airplane, then somebody
evidently has some pretty sophisticated RF technology in place.
Cell phones only have to see a single base station 5 to 10 miles away
satellitesthe ground. GPS receivers have to see at least 3 (or is it 4)
planesimultaneously, orbiting at several hundred miles altitude.
Nothing so sophisticated, "they" place a mobile base station on the
GPSand bundle the traffic into another protocol that goes over sattelite.Let's discuss up link vs down link: for TV, data, Telephone (mostly gone
(The mobile network will not like it very much when the planeload of
cellphones travels at 600 km/hour and each phone does a location update
every 200 msek when blazing past the base stations. I.O.W: it will not
work).
Getting the sattelite link to work is the hard bit - sattelites are
good for massive downlink capacity but the uplink suck.
now (GEO), but resurging at leo), etc. everything but sensor sat's, and
up link = down link, almost exactly (to be expected of "flying"repeaters).
Uhuh. I suggest you do some research - plenty of phone on GEO,
comparitively little on LEO and not resurging or even surging. Uplink <>
downlink - you clearly don't know the subject.
If you are talking about Iriduim or its main competitor they are both leo.
expected you to know. lots of beepers are geo. If you are talking about
transoceanic or transcontinental telephone it is mostly on fiber. The
customers found the geo delay disturbing.
Cell phones do not work well in airplanes (mid flight) because normalIf a microcell is placed on a plane I would suggest that ground station
cell phone site antennas are oriented (and have emission patterns) for
surface traffic.
--
antenna patterns are irrelevant. There are some well-documented instances
of perfectly adequate calls taking place from aircraft, and FAA released
estimates only yesterday of an average of 3-4 calls per flight over the
US. I think it can be safely said that cell phones will work perfectly
well in an aircraft in flight.
I did not say they would not work, i was pointing out that the ground
station antenna paterns were not in favor of it.
reply interstitial.
JosephKK
Ken
--
JosephKK
Gegen dummheit kampfen die Gotter Selbst, vergebens.
--Schiller
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: GPS trackers - a potential weapon from hell
- From: Ken Taylor
- Re: GPS trackers - a potential weapon from hell
- References:
- Re: GPS trackers - a potential weapon from hell
- From: Joseph2k
- Re: GPS trackers - a potential weapon from hell
- From: Ken Taylor
- Re: GPS trackers - a potential weapon from hell
- Prev by Date: Re: Monitoring torque on a shaft.
- Next by Date: op-amps with wide open-loop bandwidth ?
- Previous by thread: Re: GPS trackers - a potential weapon from hell
- Next by thread: Re: GPS trackers - a potential weapon from hell
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|